I have become a huge fan of director Werner Herzog since gaining access to most of his films through Netflix. Herzog movies are art that can be enjoyed by anyone. There is never any big esoteric shit that someone like me who was deprived of oxygen at birth can not understand or at least grasp to some degree. Herzog movies are art for people who don't enjoy art. Some of his movies are both action/adventure and art. See "Aguirre, Wrath of God" and "Rescue Dawn" below.
My Herzog top picks are below. Note that I have not yet seen all his documentaries. Some day I will be rich and be able to afford the Boxed Set.
"Aguirre, Wrath of God" 1972 Feature Film
"The Great Ecstasy of Woodcarver Steiner" 1976 Documentary
"Stroszek" 1977 Feature Film
"Little Dieter Needs to Fly" 1997 Documentary
"Grizzly Man" 2005 Documentary
"Rescue Dawn" 2006 Documentary
"Rescue Dawn" is a fictionalized account of Dieter Dengler's experience of being captured by the NVA during the American war with Vietnam. "Little Dieter Needs to Fly" is a documentary about Dengler's experience. Both are fucking great! There are scenes in both of these films which I will never forget. I read in a book about Herzog that Herzog complained that he was being labeled as some kind of pro-Vietnam war person because of the Dengler documentary. I think both Dengler films are anti-war war, even if they deal with a pilot who volunteered. Neither of these films are really about war, they are about pathos and loneliness. I consider myself very fortunate to have been able to see "Rescue Dawn" on the big screen. It was probably the best hour and a half of 2006 for me.
Some Herzog movies I really don't like. Sometimes I believe he really misses his mark. Some are not easy viewing and aren't in English and don't have English dubbing like "Even Dwarfs Started Small". I don't dislike foreign films, but it is sometimes so much work for me to read the subtitles fast enough and watch the movie that it becomes an annoyance. What I really need to do is learn German.
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Vikas Kapoor, Vampire
 |
| Vikas Kapoor, President and CEO of the Allied Interstate collection agency, a.k.a IQOR, a.k.a Intellirisk Management Corp. is really a vampire. One of Vikas' fangs has been circled in red. |
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Allied Interstate
I have been traumatized lately by faulty data that Trans Union reported to one of my creditors. This has left me frazzled and has hurt me financially. Trans Union asserts that they are still conducting their "investigation."
This has left me on edge and frazzled. Recently this company who says they are Allied Interstate has been calling me. They ask if I am Dickie Richards. I ask what this is about. They insist on me stating that I am Dickie Richards in order for them to divulge any information about why they are calling. There is no way I'm going to do that. After a long struggle I managed to obtain a number that I can call them at:
1-866-207-8333
Call this number. I hope that you will call it often in fact. The first thing they do is ask for a Capital One credit card number. I called Capital One. They say they are not affiliated with Allied Interstate and know nothing about this number. I asked Allied Interstate to give me the number of a human being at Capital One that I can speak to to verify that they are who they are. They simply refuse to do that but they do not refuse to stop calling me.
Allied Interstate has a seriously bad attitude as well. The most recent person who called me claimed that I was being "evasive." Funny hearing that from people who won't even tell you why they're calling. They have left me so frazzled and crazy after these confrontational phone calls that I have had to take anti-anxiety medication. I have found myself screaming at them at the top of my lungs and yelling profanities at them. This is not me. I haven't wigged like this in a good decade.
There are numerous posts on the Internet about this company being a collection agency. I read in cardreport.com that collection agents can't talk to you about the debt unless you acknowledge that you are the person they're requesting. This would be consistent with Allied Interstate's behavior. However their snarkiness calls their legitimacy into serious question. I asked them for their address. After what felt like pulling teeth, they coughed this up:
Allied Interstate
3000 Corporate Exchange Dr
Columbus, Ohio 43231-7689
I cannot find this in the business directories that I looked. When I asked them who the president was they said that they don't give out that information, that I should obtain it from the Internet. When I asked what their website was, they said they had none. Why is the president of the company a secret? The president of a company should be public information. Why don't they have a website? And most importantly, why do they say they are affiliated with Capital One when Capital One categorically denies this?
I reported Allied Interstate to the FTC and will be reporting them to the Massachusetts Attorney General. I don't really think that Federal and State Government gives a flying fuck about consumers, so I don't expect much.
I have made the decision that I am not going to risk jeopardizing myself by volunteering any personal information at all to these motherfuckers. I'm just going to have to put up with them calling me and annoying me, and perhaps they will fuck me later down the road and report some faulty credit info. It's the price you pay for this lovely system of unregulated capitalism. You can't win, even if you're the kind of person like me who always pays his bills on time. I am not even going to pick up the phone. For now on I screen all calls.
If anyone has any experience with Allied Interstate please post a comment.
This has left me on edge and frazzled. Recently this company who says they are Allied Interstate has been calling me. They ask if I am Dickie Richards. I ask what this is about. They insist on me stating that I am Dickie Richards in order for them to divulge any information about why they are calling. There is no way I'm going to do that. After a long struggle I managed to obtain a number that I can call them at:
1-866-207-8333
Call this number. I hope that you will call it often in fact. The first thing they do is ask for a Capital One credit card number. I called Capital One. They say they are not affiliated with Allied Interstate and know nothing about this number. I asked Allied Interstate to give me the number of a human being at Capital One that I can speak to to verify that they are who they are. They simply refuse to do that but they do not refuse to stop calling me.
Allied Interstate has a seriously bad attitude as well. The most recent person who called me claimed that I was being "evasive." Funny hearing that from people who won't even tell you why they're calling. They have left me so frazzled and crazy after these confrontational phone calls that I have had to take anti-anxiety medication. I have found myself screaming at them at the top of my lungs and yelling profanities at them. This is not me. I haven't wigged like this in a good decade.
There are numerous posts on the Internet about this company being a collection agency. I read in cardreport.com that collection agents can't talk to you about the debt unless you acknowledge that you are the person they're requesting. This would be consistent with Allied Interstate's behavior. However their snarkiness calls their legitimacy into serious question. I asked them for their address. After what felt like pulling teeth, they coughed this up:
Allied Interstate
3000 Corporate Exchange Dr
Columbus, Ohio 43231-7689
I cannot find this in the business directories that I looked. When I asked them who the president was they said that they don't give out that information, that I should obtain it from the Internet. When I asked what their website was, they said they had none. Why is the president of the company a secret? The president of a company should be public information. Why don't they have a website? And most importantly, why do they say they are affiliated with Capital One when Capital One categorically denies this?
I reported Allied Interstate to the FTC and will be reporting them to the Massachusetts Attorney General. I don't really think that Federal and State Government gives a flying fuck about consumers, so I don't expect much.
I have made the decision that I am not going to risk jeopardizing myself by volunteering any personal information at all to these motherfuckers. I'm just going to have to put up with them calling me and annoying me, and perhaps they will fuck me later down the road and report some faulty credit info. It's the price you pay for this lovely system of unregulated capitalism. You can't win, even if you're the kind of person like me who always pays his bills on time. I am not even going to pick up the phone. For now on I screen all calls.
If anyone has any experience with Allied Interstate please post a comment.
Friday, March 14, 2008
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Dickie Richards on McDonald's put to video
The Dickie Richards McDonald's thing has been put to video by Shawn Lennon. I think he did a good job:
http://www.youtube.com/user/lennonvideo
http://www.youtube.com/user/lennonvideo
Friday, January 25, 2008
Sushi Hell
I had Sushi (technically Sashimi) and a number of other things on Tuesday, at Sushi Man. I believe it was the Monk Fish liver that severely put me out of commission, because something seemed off about it. The dish is called Ankimo. It is supposed to be steamed. Maybe their idea of steaming a Monk Fish liver is to blow on it a bit and hope whatever deadly pathogens exist on it will keel over and die. It hit me 7 hours later. I had to go to the emergency room. They rigged me up to an IV and put me in this freezing fucking room for what seemed like 3 hours. I am sure that these crazy medical people had the air conditioning on. These people are insane, although I do commend the Newton-Wellesley Hospital people for bringing me back from the dead.
I can't go back to Sushi Man anymore. Not after nearly meeting my maker. But the thing is, I loved Sushi Man. It gave my existence purpose. Now I am back to dealing with the existential dilemma of life.
I mean, Jesus Christ, is it so hard to find good Japanese food in the Boston area that doesn't fucking kill ya?
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
Monday, November 05, 2007
Saturday, November 03, 2007
Ceding from Red Sox Nation
The Red Sox are 2007 World Champions. They swept the Rockies in the most boring World Series ever conceived by man.
Then the Red Sox came home to jam up traffic in Boston for half the day for a parade. Idiots are said have been reserving their spot on the parade route since 3:00 a.m.
The duck boats carrying the Red Sox rolled by blasting confetti. Who's going to clean that shit up, I thought. The Red Sox? No. I don't think so. More likely The City of Boston is outsourcing this to some cleaning outfit that pays poor foreigners minimun wage. Who's going to pay for the huge police presence? The Red Sox? Don't think so...
Some excited, grizzly old man in Boston tells a reporter, "We won!"
"We" didn't win shit, old man. They [The Red Sox] won. They are a privately owned team. You had nothing to do with their victory, and you will not reap any rewards from it. You had a lot to do with all the money the Red Sox raked in though.
A reporter talks about how great the Red Sox are and attributes it to the diversity of the team. He says now there are Latinos and African Americans. What planet has this guy been on? There have always been Latinos on the team. Does the name Louis Tiant ring a bell? While he's right about there always being a lack of African Americans on the team, there is currently no African Americans on the team! There hasn't been a single African American on the team for three years. He might be including Ortiz as an African American because of his dark skin. But Ortiz is from the Dominican Republican. Not the United States. He is not an African American. Is Ortiz even a naturalized American citizen? I don't know? Does the chucklehead reporter know? Doubt it. At a minimum, I think it is an incredible stretch to include Ortiz as an African American. While it's true that the team now has a greater representation from other religious/ethnic groups such as Jewish and Native American, they have less African Americans than they've ever had. The Red Sox always had one or two token African Americans. Now they have none, and NOBODY is talking about it. In fact we're pretending that there are African Americans on the team. It's amazing.
But look at all that the Red Sox are doing for kids. Poor inner city kids get to watch free Red Sox games in the "Dunkin' Donuts Dugout" section of the bleachers. They get to wear oversized Dunkin' Donuts tea-shirts, with a big stupid Dunkin' Donuts billboard over their head. And they get to be on TV too. They're live participants in the Dunkin' Donuts' advertising campaign. Dunkin' Donuts and the Red Sox really restore my faith in humanity.
I missed perhaps two or three Red Sox games in the 2007 season. Perhaps in 2008 I'll miss some more.
Then the Red Sox came home to jam up traffic in Boston for half the day for a parade. Idiots are said have been reserving their spot on the parade route since 3:00 a.m.
The duck boats carrying the Red Sox rolled by blasting confetti. Who's going to clean that shit up, I thought. The Red Sox? No. I don't think so. More likely The City of Boston is outsourcing this to some cleaning outfit that pays poor foreigners minimun wage. Who's going to pay for the huge police presence? The Red Sox? Don't think so...
Some excited, grizzly old man in Boston tells a reporter, "We won!"
"We" didn't win shit, old man. They [The Red Sox] won. They are a privately owned team. You had nothing to do with their victory, and you will not reap any rewards from it. You had a lot to do with all the money the Red Sox raked in though.
A reporter talks about how great the Red Sox are and attributes it to the diversity of the team. He says now there are Latinos and African Americans. What planet has this guy been on? There have always been Latinos on the team. Does the name Louis Tiant ring a bell? While he's right about there always being a lack of African Americans on the team, there is currently no African Americans on the team! There hasn't been a single African American on the team for three years. He might be including Ortiz as an African American because of his dark skin. But Ortiz is from the Dominican Republican. Not the United States. He is not an African American. Is Ortiz even a naturalized American citizen? I don't know? Does the chucklehead reporter know? Doubt it. At a minimum, I think it is an incredible stretch to include Ortiz as an African American. While it's true that the team now has a greater representation from other religious/ethnic groups such as Jewish and Native American, they have less African Americans than they've ever had. The Red Sox always had one or two token African Americans. Now they have none, and NOBODY is talking about it. In fact we're pretending that there are African Americans on the team. It's amazing.
But look at all that the Red Sox are doing for kids. Poor inner city kids get to watch free Red Sox games in the "Dunkin' Donuts Dugout" section of the bleachers. They get to wear oversized Dunkin' Donuts tea-shirts, with a big stupid Dunkin' Donuts billboard over their head. And they get to be on TV too. They're live participants in the Dunkin' Donuts' advertising campaign. Dunkin' Donuts and the Red Sox really restore my faith in humanity.
I missed perhaps two or three Red Sox games in the 2007 season. Perhaps in 2008 I'll miss some more.
Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Evidence That Compustar Cheated Me
In the following, I will submit physical evidence in support of the fact that Compustar Inc., in Waltham, MA, cheated me. I will do this by showing two contradictory accounts of events given by Compustar. I have provided actual scans of Compustar's responses in the REFERENCES section at the bottom.
Computar Inc. has two locations:
Headquarter
565 Moody Street
Waltham, MA 02154
Phone: 781-642-8827
Fax: 781-642-8871
Worcester Office
1280 Grafton Street
Worcester, MA 01608
Phone: 508-752-7001
Fax: 508-642-7203
Note that the website for Compustar is www.compustarpc.com, not compustar.com.
You can also get their website by googling "Compustarpc" or "Compustar pc"
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED:
I had an oral agreement with David Chang (one of the owners) for him to replace my computer's defective Asus 754 Socket motherboard for $195.00. Mr. Chang made several attempts to locate a compatible motherboard, yet ultimately told me that he was unable to locate the part, thus failing to live up to the terms of our agreement. When I went to pick up the computer, which was never repaired, Mr. Chang charged me a $45.00 diagnostic fee. At no point was I ever informed of this charge.
MR. CHANG'S FIRST FICTITIOUS ACCOUNT OF WHAT HAPPENED:
Mr. Chang's response below, dated 03/16/2007 is from the credit card chargeback reversal reason. (He was successful at reversing my chargeback):
Mr. Chang is saying here that he doesn't want to fix the problem, and that's why I don't want to pay. It's puzzling to me why a computer repair service would say that they don't want to fix a problem. This changes later, as you will see. Also, I was never at the store for service beforehand, though I once bought a computer case from the store. I fail to see the relevance of this issue though.
MR. CHANG'S SECOND FICTITIOUS ACCOUNT OF WHAT HAPPENED:
Mr. Chang's response below, dated 06/13/3007 is from the Better Business Bureau complaint I filed:
Notice how a "sign on the wall" suddenly appears in this version of events. There may be a sign there now, but there was absolutely no sign then. This actually changes to a "giant" sign in a third fictitious account Compustar gave to the Attorney General. I did not include this account because there is no written record.
The main point here -- the real contradiction is that unlike the first version of events where Mr. Chang mysteriously declines to fix the problem, now Mr. Chang is prepared to fix the problem, yet I don't want to wait for a part. This version of events is actually closer to the truth in that Mr. Chang told me that there was a "two" day wait for a part that I in fact agreed to and waited for. After two days of my computer collecting dust in his store, Mr. Chang told me that he was unable to obtain the part, yet I had to pay $45.00 for zero services rendered, which he called a "Diagnostic Fee." This fee never came up at any time and was never part of our original agreement.
I believe Mr. Chang's two contradictory versions of events is strong evidence in support of the fact that Compustar cheated me and attempted to cover this up by lying. Liars cannot keep their stories straight because fiction is much harder to recall than reality. Police are well aware of this. That's how they got Susan Smith.
Buyer Beware!
REFERENCES
Credit card chargeback response:
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-chargeback-response.gif
Better Business Bureau Complaint
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-1-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-2-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-3-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-4-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-5-of-5.gif
Computar Inc. has two locations:
Headquarter
565 Moody Street
Waltham, MA 02154
Phone: 781-642-8827
Fax: 781-642-8871
Worcester Office
1280 Grafton Street
Worcester, MA 01608
Phone: 508-752-7001
Fax: 508-642-7203
Note that the website for Compustar is www.compustarpc.com, not compustar.com.
You can also get their website by googling "Compustarpc" or "Compustar pc"
WHAT REALLY HAPPENED:
I had an oral agreement with David Chang (one of the owners) for him to replace my computer's defective Asus 754 Socket motherboard for $195.00. Mr. Chang made several attempts to locate a compatible motherboard, yet ultimately told me that he was unable to locate the part, thus failing to live up to the terms of our agreement. When I went to pick up the computer, which was never repaired, Mr. Chang charged me a $45.00 diagnostic fee. At no point was I ever informed of this charge.
MR. CHANG'S FIRST FICTITIOUS ACCOUNT OF WHAT HAPPENED:
Mr. Chang's response below, dated 03/16/2007 is from the credit card chargeback reversal reason. (He was successful at reversing my chargeback):
"I spend hours Diagnose PC.(The $45 is us store diagnose Fee) [UNDISCLOSED NAME] been to us store before for other Service. This time [UNDISCLOSED NAME] don't want to pay for it. Because we do not want to fix and that why he don't want to pay anything.
Thank You
David Chang"
Mr. Chang is saying here that he doesn't want to fix the problem, and that's why I don't want to pay. It's puzzling to me why a computer repair service would say that they don't want to fix a problem. This changes later, as you will see. Also, I was never at the store for service beforehand, though I once bought a computer case from the store. I fail to see the relevance of this issue though.
MR. CHANG'S SECOND FICTITIOUS ACCOUNT OF WHAT HAPPENED:
Mr. Chang's response below, dated 06/13/3007 is from the Better Business Bureau complaint I filed:
"$45 is store diagnose fee. I have sign on the wall for my customers. I told him the motherboard may come 3 days. But it did not. He does not want to wait another day. There is nothing I can do."
Notice how a "sign on the wall" suddenly appears in this version of events. There may be a sign there now, but there was absolutely no sign then. This actually changes to a "giant" sign in a third fictitious account Compustar gave to the Attorney General. I did not include this account because there is no written record.
The main point here -- the real contradiction is that unlike the first version of events where Mr. Chang mysteriously declines to fix the problem, now Mr. Chang is prepared to fix the problem, yet I don't want to wait for a part. This version of events is actually closer to the truth in that Mr. Chang told me that there was a "two" day wait for a part that I in fact agreed to and waited for. After two days of my computer collecting dust in his store, Mr. Chang told me that he was unable to obtain the part, yet I had to pay $45.00 for zero services rendered, which he called a "Diagnostic Fee." This fee never came up at any time and was never part of our original agreement.
I believe Mr. Chang's two contradictory versions of events is strong evidence in support of the fact that Compustar cheated me and attempted to cover this up by lying. Liars cannot keep their stories straight because fiction is much harder to recall than reality. Police are well aware of this. That's how they got Susan Smith.
Buyer Beware!
REFERENCES
Credit card chargeback response:
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-chargeback-response.gif
Better Business Bureau Complaint
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-1-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-2-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-3-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-4-of-5.gif
http://talkwarrior.com/scans/compustarpc/compustarpc-bbb-report-5-of-5.gif
Thursday, September 13, 2007
Court order to remove material from this website
For the record, Bisney (See the e-mail sent to me by his lawyer below) didn't post an "article" at the below mentioned URL, he posted a comment to my article. And it was completely off-topic. I didn't understand at the time that he was just an asshole, exploiting my website to defame someone else. I initially thought it was just another crazy troll comment. The Court Order requiring me to remove the comment, also posted in this blog entry, is legitimate and I have removed Shit-For-Brains-Bisney's comment. I'm not so hot about the judge ordering me to remove Bisney's comment. I thought it violated my right to free expression. My stepfather the lawyer didn't see it that way.
==================================================================================
"Gondelman, Larry"
to dickie_richards@[UNDISCLOSED].com
date Jul 20, 2007 3:51 PM
subject Request regarding article posted on your website.
I am counsel for Mr. John F. Bisney. Mr. Bisney wrote and posted an article on your Internet site about Ms. Kathleen A. Benz, a former friend of his. The article written by Mr. Bisney contains false statements concerning Ms. Benz that Ms. Benz, in a lawsuit pending in federal court in the District of Columbia, claims are libelous. The article appears at http://talkwarrior.com/2005/06/mary-carey-republican.html
On behalf of Mr. Bisney and with the approval of the Court (see the Order of Judge Sullivan, attached hereto), I am contacting you to request that you immediately remove this story from your website and take all steps necessary to remove the article from your Internet site and to ensure that no one performing a search of any type can locate, access, or retrieve the article.
If you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to contact me. In addition, I would ask that you advise me of your response to my requests so that I can report back to the Court. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Larry S. Gondelman
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC
1501 M Street, NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20005
202.872.6723
This message from the law firm of Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, P.C., contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient and/or have received this message in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately at 202-466-6550.
Case 1 :05-cv-01760-EGS-JMF Document 62 Filed 06/27/2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
KATHLEEN A. BENZ,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 05-1760 (EGS)
THE WASHINGTON NEWSPAPER
PUBLISHING COMPANY, LLC and
JOHN F. BISNEY,
Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion made by defendant John F.Bisney in open Court at the March 21, 2007 Status Conference for approval to communicate with Internet sites that continue to display or refer to articles that defendant Bisney authored concerning plaintiff Kathleen A. Benz for the purpose of seeking removal of such articles or references thereto from the Internet, and pursuant to the status hearing on June 21, 2007, it is by the Court hereby
ORDERED that defendant Bisney’s motion is GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Bisney shall provide to counsel for plaintiff a list of all known Internet sites that continue to display or refer to the articles or portions thereof that defendant Bisney authored or disseminated that refer to plaintiff, Kathleen A. Benz, by name or by implication (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Articles") by no later than June 29, 2007; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than June 29, 2007, defendant Bisney shall submit to counsel for plaintiff the substance of the communication defendant Bisney intends to send to all Internet sites that display or refer to the Articles or portions thereof, requesting the removal of such Articles, which communication shall comply in all respects with the terms of this Order, along with a list of such Internet sites to which defendant Bisney proposes to send such communication; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than July 9, 2007, counsel for plaintiff shall review and approve the substance of such communication by defendant Bisney to such Internet sites as well as the list of recipients of such communication, which approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, by July 19, 2007, and only upon certification from plaintiff that she has taken whatever measures she deems necessary to preserve evidence as discussed below, defendant Bisney shall send the approved communication to the approved recipients; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that prior to defendant Bisney contacting any Internet sites, plaintiff shall take whatever measures she deems necessary to preserve evidence regarding the above-referenced Articles for this litigation; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that upon completion of her preservation efforts, and by no later than July 16, 2007, plaintiff shall certify to the Court and to defendants that she has taken whatever efforts she deems necessary to preserve evidence; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Bisney shall provide all communications received from any Internet sites to counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendant The Washington Newspaper Company, LLC upon receipt.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan
United States District Judge
June 21, 2007
==================================================================================
"Gondelman, Larry"
to dickie_richards@[UNDISCLOSED].com
date Jul 20, 2007 3:51 PM
subject Request regarding article posted on your website.
I am counsel for Mr. John F. Bisney. Mr. Bisney wrote and posted an article on your Internet site about Ms. Kathleen A. Benz, a former friend of his. The article written by Mr. Bisney contains false statements concerning Ms. Benz that Ms. Benz, in a lawsuit pending in federal court in the District of Columbia, claims are libelous. The article appears at http://talkwarrior.com/2005/06/mary-carey-republican.html
On behalf of Mr. Bisney and with the approval of the Court (see the Order of Judge Sullivan, attached hereto), I am contacting you to request that you immediately remove this story from your website and take all steps necessary to remove the article from your Internet site and to ensure that no one performing a search of any type can locate, access, or retrieve the article.
If you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to contact me. In addition, I would ask that you advise me of your response to my requests so that I can report back to the Court. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Larry S. Gondelman
Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, PC
1501 M Street, NW
Suite 700
Washington, DC 20005
202.872.6723
This message from the law firm of Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, P.C., contains information which is privileged and confidential and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient and/or have received this message in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately at 202-466-6550.
Case 1 :05-cv-01760-EGS-JMF Document 62 Filed 06/27/2007
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
KATHLEEN A. BENZ,
Plaintiff,
v. Civil Action No. 05-1760 (EGS)
THE WASHINGTON NEWSPAPER
PUBLISHING COMPANY, LLC and
JOHN F. BISNEY,
Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion made by defendant John F.Bisney in open Court at the March 21, 2007 Status Conference for approval to communicate with Internet sites that continue to display or refer to articles that defendant Bisney authored concerning plaintiff Kathleen A. Benz for the purpose of seeking removal of such articles or references thereto from the Internet, and pursuant to the status hearing on June 21, 2007, it is by the Court hereby
ORDERED that defendant Bisney’s motion is GRANTED; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Bisney shall provide to counsel for plaintiff a list of all known Internet sites that continue to display or refer to the articles or portions thereof that defendant Bisney authored or disseminated that refer to plaintiff, Kathleen A. Benz, by name or by implication (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Articles") by no later than June 29, 2007; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than June 29, 2007, defendant Bisney shall submit to counsel for plaintiff the substance of the communication defendant Bisney intends to send to all Internet sites that display or refer to the Articles or portions thereof, requesting the removal of such Articles, which communication shall comply in all respects with the terms of this Order, along with a list of such Internet sites to which defendant Bisney proposes to send such communication; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than July 9, 2007, counsel for plaintiff shall review and approve the substance of such communication by defendant Bisney to such Internet sites as well as the list of recipients of such communication, which approvals shall not be unreasonably withheld; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that, by July 19, 2007, and only upon certification from plaintiff that she has taken whatever measures she deems necessary to preserve evidence as discussed below, defendant Bisney shall send the approved communication to the approved recipients; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that prior to defendant Bisney contacting any Internet sites, plaintiff shall take whatever measures she deems necessary to preserve evidence regarding the above-referenced Articles for this litigation; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that upon completion of her preservation efforts, and by no later than July 16, 2007, plaintiff shall certify to the Court and to defendants that she has taken whatever efforts she deems necessary to preserve evidence; and it is
FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Bisney shall provide all communications received from any Internet sites to counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendant The Washington Newspaper Company, LLC upon receipt.
SO ORDERED.
Signed: Emmet G. Sullivan
United States District Judge
June 21, 2007
Sunday, August 19, 2007
Perverted Justice, Pretty Perverted
Okay, for the TV illiterate out there who have never seen Dateline\to catch_a predator, in this show, they set up real sting operations to capture delusional, balding, middle-aged idiots who are thinking they are meeting up with underage teens for sex, whom they supposedly solicited online. This chucklehead who calls himself a journalist, named Chris Hansen first gives the unsuspecting sex pervs the third-degree, and then they walk outside, thinking they're home free, only to get busted by the cops. It is a full-fledged freak show. It is Cops on crack. Most of the sex-pervs caught in the sting are said to be convicted and given heavy prison sentences. What gets me is that none of these sex pervs would have committed these crimes unless they were tempted to do so. I'm not a lawyer, but it seems highly questionable to me how you could convict someone of intent to commit a crime against a minor, when the minor is really an adult pretending to be a minor. The whole thing reeks of entrapment, although they say that it is clearly not.
The main point is this: Wouldn't all this money being spent to entice people into committing crimes, arresting them, convicting them, and imprisoning them, be better spent on more teachers, or housing for the homeless, or health care for children? The answer is no. We don't care about using resources in a productive and humane manner. We prefer pissing it away on the freak show.
I know the lame counter-argument: If we didn't entice sex pervs into committing sex crimes with impostors, they would be out there committing them against real children. I'll put it bluntly. This is an argument that some type of incredible fucking moron would make. I don't know any teenage girls, but I'm willing to gamble that the percentage of teenage girls who would actually meet, in person, a balding, middle-aged idiot who solicits them for sex online, is approximately zero.
Dateline\to catch_a predator is associated with this organization called Perverted Justice:
http://www.perverted-justice.com/
Perverted Justice is a bizarre, anti-sex perv vigilante group that actively looks to entice sex pervs online with impostors posing as children for sex.
For an anti-sex perv organization, Perverted Justice is pretty damn perverted! They publicly post real-live convos they've had with sex pervs, and you can vote on which sex perv is more perverted. Here are your options:
1.) Not really Slimy
2. Somewhat Slimy
3. Just Plain Slimy
4. Really Slimy
5. Oozing, dripping with slimyness!
They also post the photos of sex pervs, but I don't think any of them look as creepy as the Perverted Justice volunteers themselves. Here is one of the Perverted Justice volunteers, Wendy O'Connell:
When I look at Wendy, all I can think of is Marlin Brando in Apocalypse Now, repeating, "The Horror. The Horror..."
The Perverted Justice volunteers also add their personal comments about the sex pervs they speak to online. Here's one:
"At this point I wanted to rip him a new asshole. I can't even begin to tell you how sick I felt"
Just to be clear, this was not said by a sex perv. It was said by a Perverted Justice volunteer about a sex perv.
Here's the full URL of the text:
http://www.perverted-justice.com/?archive=Tucsftcoach
The police, and the courts, and Dateline\to catch_a predator are working hand-in-hand with people who want to rip people new assholes. I'm not even sure how you rip a person a new asshole. Maybe Pervert Justice can explain exactly how this works.
Let's cut the crap, alright? Perverted Justice is nothing but a bunch of voyeurs seeking sadistic pleasure by creating a twisted, carnival sideshow of sex pervs on display. They're not helping children. If they were they would be volunteering their time promoting the cause of health care for children or decent housing for children.
Oh, I forgot to mention the official Perverted Justice Thong they're selling for $9.99
Jokers.
The main point is this: Wouldn't all this money being spent to entice people into committing crimes, arresting them, convicting them, and imprisoning them, be better spent on more teachers, or housing for the homeless, or health care for children? The answer is no. We don't care about using resources in a productive and humane manner. We prefer pissing it away on the freak show.
I know the lame counter-argument: If we didn't entice sex pervs into committing sex crimes with impostors, they would be out there committing them against real children. I'll put it bluntly. This is an argument that some type of incredible fucking moron would make. I don't know any teenage girls, but I'm willing to gamble that the percentage of teenage girls who would actually meet, in person, a balding, middle-aged idiot who solicits them for sex online, is approximately zero.
Dateline\to catch_a predator is associated with this organization called Perverted Justice:
http://www.perverted-justice.com/
Perverted Justice is a bizarre, anti-sex perv vigilante group that actively looks to entice sex pervs online with impostors posing as children for sex.
For an anti-sex perv organization, Perverted Justice is pretty damn perverted! They publicly post real-live convos they've had with sex pervs, and you can vote on which sex perv is more perverted. Here are your options:
1.) Not really Slimy
2. Somewhat Slimy
3. Just Plain Slimy
4. Really Slimy
5. Oozing, dripping with slimyness!
They also post the photos of sex pervs, but I don't think any of them look as creepy as the Perverted Justice volunteers themselves. Here is one of the Perverted Justice volunteers, Wendy O'Connell:
When I look at Wendy, all I can think of is Marlin Brando in Apocalypse Now, repeating, "The Horror. The Horror..."
The Perverted Justice volunteers also add their personal comments about the sex pervs they speak to online. Here's one:
"At this point I wanted to rip him a new asshole. I can't even begin to tell you how sick I felt"
Just to be clear, this was not said by a sex perv. It was said by a Perverted Justice volunteer about a sex perv.
Here's the full URL of the text:
http://www.perverted-justice.com/?archive=Tucsftcoach
The police, and the courts, and Dateline\to catch_a predator are working hand-in-hand with people who want to rip people new assholes. I'm not even sure how you rip a person a new asshole. Maybe Pervert Justice can explain exactly how this works.
Let's cut the crap, alright? Perverted Justice is nothing but a bunch of voyeurs seeking sadistic pleasure by creating a twisted, carnival sideshow of sex pervs on display. They're not helping children. If they were they would be volunteering their time promoting the cause of health care for children or decent housing for children.
Oh, I forgot to mention the official Perverted Justice Thong they're selling for $9.99
Jokers.
Monday, August 13, 2007
What ever happened to Dr. Ruth?
I haven't seen Dr. Ruth for what seems like decades. Is she even still alive? I have been thinking about seeing her once on Letterman, where she was talking about some woman who wanted to feel pleasure in her vagina, and Ruth suggested that this woman buy a cucumber... At this point Letterman pretended to freak out by the comment.
Now that I think about this, it was really bad advice. I'm about the farthest away from a sex expert that you could be, but I know enough to know that you don't want to put a fucking cucumber in your vagina. I mean, hasn't Dr. Ruth ever heard of Salmonella or Staphylococcus? This is some major league bacteria. There are now anti-biotic resistant strains of Staph. This is a super-bug. It will really fuck you up. Yes, I know you could wash the cucumber off, but still, you don't want to go there. Certainly there are some more sanitary phallus substitutes that a woman could use. Jesus.
Now that I think about this, it was really bad advice. I'm about the farthest away from a sex expert that you could be, but I know enough to know that you don't want to put a fucking cucumber in your vagina. I mean, hasn't Dr. Ruth ever heard of Salmonella or Staphylococcus? This is some major league bacteria. There are now anti-biotic resistant strains of Staph. This is a super-bug. It will really fuck you up. Yes, I know you could wash the cucumber off, but still, you don't want to go there. Certainly there are some more sanitary phallus substitutes that a woman could use. Jesus.
Sunday, July 08, 2007
Review: Ego & Hubris: The Michael Malice Story
Ego & Hubris: The Michael Malice Story is a novel in the form of a comic book, by Harvey Pekar, illustrated by Gary Dumm. Unlike other other Pekar novels that I've read, Pekar doesn't use himself as the central character. In fact, Pekar only makes a short appearance at the end. The hero of this novel is this guy named Michael Malice. Unlike the Pekar character, who is a likable, sort of Jewish Bukowski, Malice is an annoying, pompous asshole, who is completely unlikable. What's strange about the book is that Malice is not given a writing credit, which made may wonder if Malice is a fictional character. After reading the book, it was difficult to conceive that anyone could make this shit up. The Malice character written about in the book has a real life blog:
http://michaelmalice.com/
It is a somewhat pathetic blog, with lame, and sometimes bordering on inane sounding comments from someone who is self-described in Pekar's book as having a 160 I.Q. As early as page 4 of the book, Malice says:
Malice, who is under the mistaken impression that intelligence can be quantitatively measured like height, never lets you forget how fucking smart and superior he is. Malice tells you that his I.Q. is 4 standard deviations above the average I.Q. (this is really, really high), yet what he doesn't tell you is that whites, on average, score above average on the test. I recently looked at one source that claimed that blacks scored, on average, 15 points lower than whites in I.Q. 15 points is 1 standard deviation. I have not looked at enough sources to verify this 15 point difference, yet if blacks score lower than whites, I don't know how you can embrace the test without embracing the notion of white superiority. There is no physiological evidence to support this whatsoever. Even without the racial disparity, the I.Q. test is a bullshit, unreliable, unproven test, and most actual smart people, that aren't fucking megalomaniacs like Malice, understand that the I.Q. test is a useful instrument for maintaining the status quo, and nothing more!
Okay, enough about Malice's big I.Q. I made such a big deal about it because Malice does. It seems to be the basis of his feelings of superiority and perhaps even his backwards, anti-social political beliefs. I never got straight what Malice was: Republican, Libertarian, Anarchist? Whatever the case, they are all anti-social, "fuck-you" belief systems, that inherently favor the rich over the poor, no matter how they're rationalized. While Republicans and Libertarians tend to be far bigger assholes than anarchists, anarchism, is just such a flawed, screwed-up, backwards notion that it's hard to put it into words.
I'm giving Pekar a score of 9 out of 10 for this book. Why such a good score after going off on my disdain for Malice? Well, because Malice is the king of confrontation. The book is essentially a chronology of events where he confronts unscrupulous, power-lusting authority figures. And what Malice does is he puts the bastards in their place! As much as I hate Malice personally, you gotta respect the guy. He even makes a fairly profound comment about life that is worthy of a highly intelligent person. I am only knocking a point off my rating because Malice is such an aversive character. The truly brilliant person here is Pekar, for writing such an entertaining book about such an asshole.
And by the way, Malice. Do you really expect people to believe you gave up your promising career as a stand-up comedian because you didn't want to travel around on tour? Give me a break. How dumb do you think we inferior people really are?
http://michaelmalice.com/
It is a somewhat pathetic blog, with lame, and sometimes bordering on inane sounding comments from someone who is self-described in Pekar's book as having a 160 I.Q. As early as page 4 of the book, Malice says:
"I Was A Brilliant Kid. People Think That It's Bragging to Say You're Brilliant. But If I were The Tallest Kid, It Would Be Regarded As a Mere Statement Of Fact. So I'm Not Sure Why It's Regarded As Arrogance When I say I Was Smarter Than Everyone."
Malice, who is under the mistaken impression that intelligence can be quantitatively measured like height, never lets you forget how fucking smart and superior he is. Malice tells you that his I.Q. is 4 standard deviations above the average I.Q. (this is really, really high), yet what he doesn't tell you is that whites, on average, score above average on the test. I recently looked at one source that claimed that blacks scored, on average, 15 points lower than whites in I.Q. 15 points is 1 standard deviation. I have not looked at enough sources to verify this 15 point difference, yet if blacks score lower than whites, I don't know how you can embrace the test without embracing the notion of white superiority. There is no physiological evidence to support this whatsoever. Even without the racial disparity, the I.Q. test is a bullshit, unreliable, unproven test, and most actual smart people, that aren't fucking megalomaniacs like Malice, understand that the I.Q. test is a useful instrument for maintaining the status quo, and nothing more!
Okay, enough about Malice's big I.Q. I made such a big deal about it because Malice does. It seems to be the basis of his feelings of superiority and perhaps even his backwards, anti-social political beliefs. I never got straight what Malice was: Republican, Libertarian, Anarchist? Whatever the case, they are all anti-social, "fuck-you" belief systems, that inherently favor the rich over the poor, no matter how they're rationalized. While Republicans and Libertarians tend to be far bigger assholes than anarchists, anarchism, is just such a flawed, screwed-up, backwards notion that it's hard to put it into words.
I'm giving Pekar a score of 9 out of 10 for this book. Why such a good score after going off on my disdain for Malice? Well, because Malice is the king of confrontation. The book is essentially a chronology of events where he confronts unscrupulous, power-lusting authority figures. And what Malice does is he puts the bastards in their place! As much as I hate Malice personally, you gotta respect the guy. He even makes a fairly profound comment about life that is worthy of a highly intelligent person. I am only knocking a point off my rating because Malice is such an aversive character. The truly brilliant person here is Pekar, for writing such an entertaining book about such an asshole.
And by the way, Malice. Do you really expect people to believe you gave up your promising career as a stand-up comedian because you didn't want to travel around on tour? Give me a break. How dumb do you think we inferior people really are?
Friday, June 15, 2007
28 Weeks Later Sucks Giant Elephant Cock
I never have time for this blog anymore. I just want to quickly say what a sucky let-down 28 Weeks Later was. Movie reviewers point out the movie's flaws, however, from reading many personal reviews of the movie, it's obvious that many people have no fucking taste whatsoever.
28 Days Later, one of my favorite horror movies, was gory, but it was not gore for the sake of gore. It had real characters that you could relate to, not the cliched, noble American soldier characters that looked like they came right out of a Hollywood action/adventure movie. Cookie-cutter bullshit like that makes me want to puke.
28 Weeks Later has vast plot holes, very little character development, its story is unrealized. It is nothing more than a cheap, exploitative gore fest, pretending to be artsy.
I liked the two kids in the movie. I liked their mother. They seemed real to me. The father seemed real to me until he turned into a zombie. Everything else in the movie seemed truly sucky and unreal. One other thing. I see movie reviewers talking about this movie as a metaphor for America's occupation of Iraq. Maybe, but it sure ain't a powerful one if it is. You want a good zombie metaphor for the occupation of Iraq, see Romero's Land of the Dead. This was not a great movie, but a far better sequel than 28 Weeks Later.
Better get ready. 28 Months Later will probably be coming out soon. Then 28 Years Later. Gas is expensive, and exploitative filmmakers have expensive cars, yachts and Cessnas to gas up. You must help them!
28 Days Later, one of my favorite horror movies, was gory, but it was not gore for the sake of gore. It had real characters that you could relate to, not the cliched, noble American soldier characters that looked like they came right out of a Hollywood action/adventure movie. Cookie-cutter bullshit like that makes me want to puke.
28 Weeks Later has vast plot holes, very little character development, its story is unrealized. It is nothing more than a cheap, exploitative gore fest, pretending to be artsy.
I liked the two kids in the movie. I liked their mother. They seemed real to me. The father seemed real to me until he turned into a zombie. Everything else in the movie seemed truly sucky and unreal. One other thing. I see movie reviewers talking about this movie as a metaphor for America's occupation of Iraq. Maybe, but it sure ain't a powerful one if it is. You want a good zombie metaphor for the occupation of Iraq, see Romero's Land of the Dead. This was not a great movie, but a far better sequel than 28 Weeks Later.
Better get ready. 28 Months Later will probably be coming out soon. Then 28 Years Later. Gas is expensive, and exploitative filmmakers have expensive cars, yachts and Cessnas to gas up. You must help them!
Friday, May 11, 2007
Go To Jail Paris, Go Directly To Jail!
For reasons of posterity I have saved the text of Paris Hilton's petition to Governor Gropenator that she not go to jail below. If it wasn't real I would think it was satire. (I mean, wow, what would our "mundane" lives be like without Paris Hilton's "beauty and excitement"!)
The petition is an example of writing written by and for the incredibly stupid. I'm willing to gamble that Paris wrote it herself. I encourage everyone reading this to sign Paris' petition as Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck or Mao Zedong, or whatever...
Paris Hilton will have it much easier than us mundane folk in jail. The jailers will segregate her so that she doesn't get her ass kicked, though I suspect the women in the jail will be more interested in getting her autograph than kicking her ass.
Paris will live. She not only broke the law, she showed contempt for the law and absolutely no remorse whatsoever. Let her do her time like the mundane people.
To:
The Honorable Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
Paris Whitney Hilton is an American celebrity and socialite. She is an heiress to a share of the Hilton Hotel fortune, as well as to the real estate fortune of her father Richard Hilton. She provides hope for young people all over the U.S. and the world. She provides beauty and excitement to (most of) our otherwise mundane lives.
Hilton is notable for her leading roles on the FOX reality series The Simple Life and in the remake of the Vincent Price horror classic "House of Wax". In addition to her work as an actress, she has achieved some recognition as a model, celebrity spokesperson, singer, and writer.
As most of America now knows, Ms. Hilton was just charged in a Los Angeles court with DUI and sentenced to 45 days in Century Regional Detention Facility in California beginning on or before June 5, 2007.
We, the American public who support Paris, are shocked, dismayed and appalled by how Paris has been the person to be used as an example that Drunk Driving is wrong. We do not support drunk driving or DUI charges. Paris should have been sober. But she shouldn't go to jail, either.
As depicted on Friday night's episode "Nancy Grace" on Headline News (May 4, 2007), countless celebrities have been "slapped on the wrist" for similar incidents recently. Nick Nolte, Mel Gibson, Tracy Morgan, Wynonna Judd, to name a few, were arrested and never did a day in jail after their initial arrests for drunk driving /DUI /DWI charges. Rappers Busta Rhymes and Eve still walk free after both being arrested for the same charges as Ms. Hilton just this past week. Brandy's California Highway accident, although no proof of DUI was evidenced in her accident, resulting in the death of a young wife and mother in California, yet Brandy walks free as of today, never doing any time and A WOMAN HAS BEEN KILLED most likely due to her reckless driving!
Yet, Paris Hilton did not hurt, injure, or kill anyone or anything, and yet she must do jail time.
This petition is to ask Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to pardon Paris Hilton for her mistake. Please allow her to her return to her career and life. Everyone makes mistakes. She didn't hurt or kill anyone, and she has learned her lesson. She is sincere, apologetic, and full of regret for her actions as she explained tearfully to the Judge handling her case in court yesterday.She is distraught and understandably afraid.
WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT to save our Paris from ending up at the Century Regional Detention Facility! Please sign to tell The Honorable Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of the State of California, to think about the welfare of this young woman who has made a mortal error and deserves a second chance like so many others in our great nation have been served with after a mistake they have made . If the late Former President Gerald Ford could find it in his heart to pardon the late Former President Richard Nixon after his mistake(s), we undeniably support Paris Hilton being pardoned for her honest mistake as well, and we hope and expect The Governor will understand and grant this unusual but important request in good faith to Ms. Paris Whitney Hilton.
The petition is an example of writing written by and for the incredibly stupid. I'm willing to gamble that Paris wrote it herself. I encourage everyone reading this to sign Paris' petition as Mickey Mouse or Donald Duck or Mao Zedong, or whatever...
Paris Hilton will have it much easier than us mundane folk in jail. The jailers will segregate her so that she doesn't get her ass kicked, though I suspect the women in the jail will be more interested in getting her autograph than kicking her ass.
Paris will live. She not only broke the law, she showed contempt for the law and absolutely no remorse whatsoever. Let her do her time like the mundane people.
To:
The Honorable Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger
Paris Whitney Hilton is an American celebrity and socialite. She is an heiress to a share of the Hilton Hotel fortune, as well as to the real estate fortune of her father Richard Hilton. She provides hope for young people all over the U.S. and the world. She provides beauty and excitement to (most of) our otherwise mundane lives.
Hilton is notable for her leading roles on the FOX reality series The Simple Life and in the remake of the Vincent Price horror classic "House of Wax". In addition to her work as an actress, she has achieved some recognition as a model, celebrity spokesperson, singer, and writer.
As most of America now knows, Ms. Hilton was just charged in a Los Angeles court with DUI and sentenced to 45 days in Century Regional Detention Facility in California beginning on or before June 5, 2007.
We, the American public who support Paris, are shocked, dismayed and appalled by how Paris has been the person to be used as an example that Drunk Driving is wrong. We do not support drunk driving or DUI charges. Paris should have been sober. But she shouldn't go to jail, either.
As depicted on Friday night's episode "Nancy Grace" on Headline News (May 4, 2007), countless celebrities have been "slapped on the wrist" for similar incidents recently. Nick Nolte, Mel Gibson, Tracy Morgan, Wynonna Judd, to name a few, were arrested and never did a day in jail after their initial arrests for drunk driving /DUI /DWI charges. Rappers Busta Rhymes and Eve still walk free after both being arrested for the same charges as Ms. Hilton just this past week. Brandy's California Highway accident, although no proof of DUI was evidenced in her accident, resulting in the death of a young wife and mother in California, yet Brandy walks free as of today, never doing any time and A WOMAN HAS BEEN KILLED most likely due to her reckless driving!
Yet, Paris Hilton did not hurt, injure, or kill anyone or anything, and yet she must do jail time.
This petition is to ask Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to pardon Paris Hilton for her mistake. Please allow her to her return to her career and life. Everyone makes mistakes. She didn't hurt or kill anyone, and she has learned her lesson. She is sincere, apologetic, and full of regret for her actions as she explained tearfully to the Judge handling her case in court yesterday.She is distraught and understandably afraid.
WE NEED YOUR SUPPORT to save our Paris from ending up at the Century Regional Detention Facility! Please sign to tell The Honorable Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of the State of California, to think about the welfare of this young woman who has made a mortal error and deserves a second chance like so many others in our great nation have been served with after a mistake they have made . If the late Former President Gerald Ford could find it in his heart to pardon the late Former President Richard Nixon after his mistake(s), we undeniably support Paris Hilton being pardoned for her honest mistake as well, and we hope and expect The Governor will understand and grant this unusual but important request in good faith to Ms. Paris Whitney Hilton.
Friday, May 04, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)